Malaysia

FLEGT in Malaysia

Serious outstanding issues must be resolved before a VPA can be signed. These include recognition of native customary rights and a stakeholder consultation process which is of major concern as it is failing to bring consensus or deal with long standing conflicts. The problem is most stark in the Malaysian State of Sarawak, which holds a large amount of the country’s forests, has a majority of indigenous peoples, and is home to over 150 court cases involving land claims.

Results 1 - 10 of 31

Documents

15/07/2011 English Civil society publications, FLEGT, Indonesia, Malaysia

Although Malaysia was one of the first countries to start negotiating a VPA, it has not yet finalised an agreement. The Ministry of Plantations Industries and Commodities never developed a proper consultation process making Malaysia the exception when compared to other VPA countries. But the signing of the VPA with Indonesia and the adoption of the EU Timber Regulation - which could have an impact on the export from Malaysia to the EU as traders may be concerned about the risk of to importing illegal timber - has now led to renewed interest in Malaysia in signing a VPA with the EU.

03/05/2010 English FLEGT, Malaysia

The research underlying the production of this report is coordinated by the Institute for Development of Alternative Livestyle Lifestyle (IDEAL) on behalf of JOANGOHUTAN. In this report, we argue that Malaysia, and more cogently the Sarawak state government, are in violation of national, state and international laws in recognising NCR, despite clear court decisions upholding NCR.

03/05/2010 English FLEGT, Malaysia, Legality Assurance System (LAS), Legality Definition

Regarding definition of legal timber, concerns of Social NGOs expressed during the 3rd multi-stakeholder consultation, November 2007 including:

20/11/2009 English FLEGT, Malaysia

The MPIC has furnished us with their responses dated Nov 17, 2008 to the two documents submitted during our dialogue with them. We however found that the reply from MPIC has failed to adduce any new information on the range of issues raised, apart from the positive inclusion of the Aboriginal Peoples’ Act 1954 in Principle 4 (Peninsular Malaysia) into the TLAS.